Article 139 (g) of Article 139 (g) of the defendant, the gift of presentation by the plaintiff in favor of the defendant as a person who is the person to whom the plaintiff testified. The case was reported to have changed. The plaintiff's testimony as to the testimony of the plaintiff has been dismissed that he was informed of the suit mutation by Patwari and it is best to say that such informant as the witness by the Patwari and the plaintiff. It may be testified that the sale case will be brought against the claimant in this case. Under Article 129 (g) of the Convention of Shahadat, the plaintiff did not examine the informant in support of his position at the time of mutation or transaction as proof of restraint on the Patwari plaintiff, therefore, he did not say Could The assurance that the plaintiff was deferred payment was made by the plaintiff failed to prove the sale of the gift to the plaintiff in circumstances r \ n the suit was dismissed.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
