Section 13 student E Assad, the postman plaintiff's exam performance, filed a premature lawsuit that was dismissed concurrently. Receipt of receipt of confession was not offered if the applicant wanted under section 13 (3) was sent by registered post confession. Under the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, the receipt of approval was returned and in the event of non-receipt or refusal to receive, the envelope was received by the applicant, which was verified by only one person. ? Regarding the facts, it would have been speculated that after the defendant's denial, the notice of the petitioner was served regularly, it was necessary for the plaintiff applicant to prove that he had, in fact, sought Notice was sent. Due notice by the approval of the registered cover envelope or, in fact, the defendant may have notice of the defendant's service notice of the plaintiff, upon receipt of confession with the validity of the postal employee or the production of the envelope, if denied Or received by Postman's Production, who did so, no doubt, in the present case, the alphabet appears on the \ AD on receipt, but the person who issued it has the right to prove it. In fact, the alphabet was \ AD written and the notice was actually sent by the registered cover envelope for Or was it, because the pre-emptor had to send the notice to the fact that the evidence was obtained by admitting the registered cover envelope through the evidence and credible evidence, and if the receipt of the notice was denied by the defendant. Continue through it
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
