Find a Lawyer

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus RAHEELA SABIR

Sections 13 (1), (2) and (3) the plaintiff and the plaintiff's student-plaintiff sent a notice containing the student's disclosure through the post-affidavit registered by the plaintiff and student-student. Revealed the source from which information about the sale was made, nor about the place, he had known about the sale, but after that he had stated that he had visited the mosque. Had learned A postal receipt was not submitted by the plaintiff of section 13 (3) of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991, the amendment request was not dismissed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013

• ZAHID JAVED v. Haji ABDUL SATTAR through Legal heirs 2013 YLR 2457
• KANWAR MEHMOOD AHMED v. Rao TAHIR ALI KHAN 2013 YLR 2484
• MUHAMMAD YOUSAF v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 2013 YLR 2494
• TAFSEER ABBAS SHAH v. State 2013 YLR 2505
• Sheikh RASHEED AHMED v. BADAR ZIA 2013 YLR 2530
• KHALID MEHMOOD v. State 2013 YLR 2538
• FAISAL AYUB v. State 2013 YLR 2551
• ALI BAHADUR v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 2013 YLR 2555

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocate from Lower Dir lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes