Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 419/420/467/468/471/161 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Prevention of Fraud, Fraud and Illegal Arrest, FI The complainant, accusing RK of delaying the charge, alleged that he had deposited his loan amount against two vouchers, but the accused misused his money and it was not deposited in the bank. The accusation was made six years ago and the six-year delay in filing the FIR was not explained. In the FIR that it returned the money through bank vouchers through two vouchers, it was revealed that the loan was presented in the name of a cooperative society which the complainant himself had received as the treasurer of the society. The defendant never received any loan amount, which had nothing to show for two receipts, alleging fraud, forgery or fraud or any association with an employee for linking the accused. No evidence directly with the prosecution for. In connection with the preparation of any Fake Society of the Cooperative Society, the marginal witnesses did not engage the accused in their statements under Section 161 CCPC and the case was made on the basis of mere suspicion. Has been confirmed
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
