Sections 302, 148 and 149 of the morning, riots, testimony of the joint evidence, the complainant has not taken advantage of the doubt that the accused or the accused were armed with any weapon and that no one was hurt. ? In the FIR, the victim's name was mentioned, but, during a trial court appearance, the complainant changed his position, saying that the accused had fired with his pistol, which left his father's left thigh. Had fallen outwards, causing a fire. From the true witnesses of the prosecution, who had improved their statements to relying on their statements, the interested witnesses were not safe, which was full of dishonesty, the ocular account contradicts the medical evidence on record. ? Only based on irrelevant evidence; and in the case of the prosecution, the crime and any suspicion arising must be resolved in favor of the accused; the prosecutor failed to prove his case against the accused. The accused was convicted of the charge and charged, and he was acquitted of the charge, giving him the benefit of the doubt and was released in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
