Claim for sale of suit land by the defendant by the plaintiff through section 4242 Limitation Act (IX of IX88), Article 2020 Spec Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 suit land 17 199 1994 30 12 Was listed in 2002. Plaintiff's claim of inheritance in the land by the plaintiff when after the death of her reluctant cousin, the cousin of the plaintiff plaintiff never challenged the change of suit on 13 12 2002 before her death. The suit did not claim ownership rights in the land, nor did the claimant explain the delay. In the event of wrongful change, the right to sue will be assembled from the time of its verification, therefore, the case presented under Article 120 of the Fact Act 1908 was banned; the plaintiff did not request the suit. The change was not independently affirmed and with the consent of his predecessor, the defendant had improved the suit area and fitted the tube well, the fact that the plaintiff did not deny that the mutation did not occur. The party (as a third party) was responsible for invalidating the mutation and not approving it in accordance with the law. There was no case was not a simple case without seeking possession for the declaration because it was not sustained under the Relief Section. The Special Relief Act, 42 Swam mutation of 1877 was included in the jam bond, thus, the authorization Will attach it as a title document. Excluded with cost. r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
