Articles 6 376, 4 354 and 111111 rape or attempt to commit a criminal force with intent to rape a woman The benefit of the doubt of the testimony was the accusation against the accused that he had filed a complaint with the accused. Tried to abduct the daughter of the court, accused the accused and co-accused under section 6 376 and 11 376, PPC and sentenced the accused under section 4 354, PPC and sentenced him to 30, Rs imprisonment imprisonment Thousands were fined and the co-accused was acquitted; the victim's father, Waldetti, complained was not a witness and what he heard from his daughter Victim Who had appeared in the witness box and claimed that the accused and the accomplice had committed one of the other atrocities with her and made noise at the time of the incident which led to her Was attracted to Cousins When witnessing the incident, when it was said that the cousin was cross-examined with statements under Section 161 CCPC, a number of corrections were found through which the ocular account contained evidence of the deceased in the present case. At the same time, his cousin and the affected girl not only accused the accused and the co-accused of trying to rape her but he suspended her in the inspection. The two accused, one by one, committed rape because of the report of the Chemical Examiner and Medical Evidence, the statement of the victim was rejected and the medical officer's statement said that the hymen was intact and the affected woman only A later chart report shows redness. The Chemical Examiner did not support the prosecution, which according to Shloe
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
