Section 498 of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), section 365b abduction, abduction of a woman or forced marriage, etc., did not specify the delay in registration of the FIR before arrest and the delay of twenty-eight days. The complainant's alleged abductor denied the allegations in the FIR in his statement filed under THP 161, CRPC. And said that he had, at his own will and voluntarily, entered into a marriage contract with the accused. And that no one had kidnapped him, even in his statement filed under the Special Judicial Magistrate's Section 1, CCPC, that the alleged kidnapper had denied his abduction and that the accused would complain. To trace the entire family to the confirmed facts of his marriage with Wali, it seems that the accused persons in the case, who were formerly non-criminals, were never involved in any criminal case, the accused persons, already Were involved in the investigation, sending them behind bars, could not serve any purpose, the accused could not be lied to. S. These ideas were denied, in which case the advertising accused were already guaranteed pre-arrest bail.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
