SUPREME COURT BAR ASSOCIATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 177 Appointment of judges of the Supreme Court The principles of sanity and valid expectation do not apply to the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court, nor can it be extended because the appointment of a senior judge of a high court There is no constitutional convention or tradition for the past. The principle of fitness and suitability of a judge of the Supreme Court contradicts the principles of sanity and justification, the absence of the most senior words in Article 177 of the Constitution for the appointment of judges of the Supreme Court suggests that the judge in it Is seniority. There is no hearing for his appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court, nor does the principle of seniority apply as a necessary rule for the appointment of judges in the Supreme Court, nor does the above rule attain the status of Convention Chief. Is. Justice Pakistan is a complex family of the country's judiciary and the best judges to detect and evaluate it are the appointment of the judges to the Supreme Court for the position of high judiciary and the recommendations of the Chief Justice of Pakistan are not a fair rule, For the unnecessary views, the views of the Chief Justice of Pakistan cannot be arbitrarily rejected and if the executive wishes to disagree with his views, he will have to record strong reasons which will be justified.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Rabwah lawyer