Find a Lawyer

NAZIR AHMAD SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Section 2A of the Service Tribunals Act 1973 [as amended by the Service Tribunals (Amendment) Act (XVII of 1997]] and the 4 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Constitution of Section 5 Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3). The respondent corporation removed the applicant. 29 199 1994 Appeal to the Employment Petitioner's Department was dismissed on 6 1997, but it challenged it before the service tribunal before being temporarily banned, with the application The delay was presented by stating the reasons for the justification. At the convenience of the tribunal, the service tribunal delayed, with relief, also appealed the request that Section 2A, 10 6 1997 of the Service Tribunals Act, 1973, which was not repudiated in the process, was, therefore, The applicant was not one. In the history of public servants, when both disputed orders were approved, the service tribunal on accuracy should have taken a softer approach considering the delayed appeal to the appellant SU. The Supreme Court, in some cases, turned the application into appeal and accepted it, set aside the nominated decision and remanded the case to the Service Tribunal, which directed that in light of the Supreme Court's observations. A late apology request should be reviewed. In the Mohammad Yaqub case (2000 SCMR 830) and the Civil Appeal No 882 to 890 in 1999, decide on an uncontested decision and simultaneous appeal on the merits so that the case can be dismissed to prevent the case from being remanded. family advocate from Tarnol lawyer