Find a Lawyer

SABOOR AHMAD versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, SUI SOUTHERN COMPANY LIMITED, UNIVERSITY ROAD, KARACHI

Section 2A & 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the Services Tribunals Act 1973 (Applicant), because of the absence of duty due to the applicant being involved in a criminal case as an employee of Sui Northern Gas Company. Was retired His service after being acquitted of a criminal trial, but his absence was considered a special leave without pay, and the appeal was preferred by the applicant before the service tribunal was dismissed. It was that the duration of her absence could not be cured. As a special pay leave, as he was involved in a false case, in which he was acquitted, and performing his duties during his detention, it was not possible for him to confirm the restoration order. Applicant's retention was conditional. The pay period of his absence was suitably treated as a special leave without pay because the applicant had no casualties and no ear. d Leave on its credibility, so there was no question of salary and other benefits for the period, no legal weakness maintained by the fact finding and service tribunal filed by the department authority. There is no question of not considering any material piece of evidence. The matter was of public importance as the Supreme Court did not interfere in finding the facts given by the department authority and the service tribunal. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Havelian lawyer