Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE versus INSPECTOR GENERAL, FRONTIER CORPS, N W.F.P., PESHAWAR

Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Applicant removed from employment for disobedience to legal orders was punished for being a Frontier Corps employee, against which his Court of Appeal Simultaneously the appeal was before the dismissal of the service tribunal. Much material was collected to prove that the applicant was guilty of complying with the legal orders of his order, which was against the good order of the Conduct Service. The applicant is a member of the disciplinary force in this regard, but he had the authority to issue orders. He was reluctant to do so because the petitioner boycotted the departmental examination and persuaded other members of the force not to appear in the examination that the petitioner wanted to have his examiner examined, which was not valid on any principle of law. The committee was constituted, the applicant did not accept its formation, and prayed that the good conduct of the applicant should be taken from some other units of S. It was sufficient to prove that the command. Does not care about orders and has deliberately violated legal orders. The applicant's conduct was not only inappropriate for a member of the disciplinary force, but was a serious objection to being a servant of the government. The decision passed by the service tribunal was not open to any exception attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Dadakhel lawyer