Find a Lawyer

KHUSHAL KHAN versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Muslim Commercial Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules, 1981, Item No. 12 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Complaint notice before filing a complaint application terminates the service The petitioner filed an appeal before the next high authority against his dismissal order while in the service of Muslim Commercial Bank Limited, but was dismissed by the Labor Court dismissing his complaint by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. His appeal was dismissed on the ground that he did not give notice of complaint to his employer. , And that their court appeal cannot be equated to a complaint notice, which was a legal requirement to be fulfilled by a worker under Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, a constitutional petition filed by the applicant in the High Court. The dismissal was also rejected by the notice of complaint against his dismissal order to his employer as it is deemed to exist separately from the original authority capable of permanent reinforcement. The appointment of the Petitioner to the Regional Manager As a competent authority, while he appealed to the president of the bank, Rory was not the authority that the applicant was a cashier. According to the Muslim Commercial Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules 1981, a Category Officer, the President of the Bank may not be his appointing authority, but the Regional Manager shall be the applicant for the purposes of Section 25A of the Industrial Relations Ordinance. In the meaning of section 25A of the 1969 Industrial Relations Ordinance, the appeal filed by the applicant before the President of the Bank cannot be accepted as a complaint notice, 1 power of attorney advocate Dinga lawyer