Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HASSAN, STENOGRAPHER, FINANCE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, PRIVATIZATION COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD

Rule 3 (a) and 4 (1) (b) (ii) of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973, Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3). Appeals from the department filed by the government employees to the services on the grounds of irregular absence from mandatory retirement duty were accepted and it was stated that the appeal filed by the public servants before the service tribunal was dismissed. The greater punishment was changed to prevent two increments without penalty. The effect was withheld, but he was not allowed to do so even after two years, although at the time of the penalty for withholding the increment, he was receiving the maximum salary for the post, which he is entitled to. There was no question of the law of public importance, even the virtues of a civil servant were not prosecuted because he could not justify the absence of duty for so long the service tribunal had already adopted a serious view of the government employee's issue. Can be aggravated by the Department authorities, and if they can get relief like this He failed to account, because they are an issue that can refer to Service Tribunal of the Supreme Court denied leave to appeal and no eligibility application. top advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer