Sections 13 and 14 were filed by the plaintiff before the performance of the demands by the guardian or agent plaintiff, which was dismissed by the trial court but the same decision was pronounced by the appellate court when the right to reinstatement was personal. Once the task was done by the plaintiff and the accused and the plaintiff in the case, then it was necessary for him to appear in the trial court to record his statement. In the absence of the plaintiff from the court, questions about the performance of the students may raise questions that the plaintiff was not prepared to face the cross. Examination Section 14 of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pre-Impression Act, 1987, which was the reason that the demands were made by a guardian or agent for disability, after the filibuster performance, the plaintiff sent his special counsel to record the statement. Determined, the intention was to vacate the property, except for the pre-emptor's mind who demanded the jump, but the pre-emptor himself was present for T's performance. The order was not available to replace the former attorney umpire's attorney for the appointment of a lawyer to prosecute on her behalf. It can be given, not to the plaintiff came to the conclusion that the evidence they had been approved revision was performed and the case was dropped
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
