Sections 13 and 14 were charged with possessing unlicensed weapons and the third was their accomplice. The accused cannot be acquitted of the responsibility of arms and ammunition and neither can be concealed with his consent or knowledge. Can be recovered It is alleged that he did not record anything to establish weapons and ammunition. They were prosecuted. The prosecution's witnesses had made a clear inquiry into the incident, and no contradiction in their statements could have led to the prosecution's version. Nothing was on record to suggest that the offending articles were either alleged or that the accused was falsely accused of failing to bring charges. On the record, any bead or Ultra Mot ive policeman was as good a witness as any of the private witnesses and his statements could not be set aside, Amor gave his specific opinion on the service of the weapon which was rejected. The number of weapons was given in the preliminary report and there was nothing in it. The trial court had softened the trial while the accused were sentenced to three years imprisonment with a fine of Rs 10,000 and appeals were dismissed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
