Sections 9 (c), 34 and 35 Rules of Drugs (Government Analysts), 2001, 4 and 5 Smuggling and smuggling of narcotics, valuing the evidence The defendant's lawyer admitted that the ban was illegal. Was sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory. Within 72 hours, he had declared the report of the forensic science laboratory illegal and declared the arrest illegal in the eyes of the law, as regulated by the Drug Subjects (Government Analysts) Rule, 2001 Or 5 was listed, the justification said. Ban the Investigating Officer to send a sample within the last two hours after the seizure or to receive the report of the Franzic Science Laboratory after fifteen days, otherwise the subject matter for expert opinion cannot be delayed in the relevant quarter. The case of litigation, nor will it eliminate the obvious values of such a report, was also signed by the Chemical Examiner on the Franzik Science Laboratory report. As denied by the Chemical Expert, who was the officer authorized in this regard under Sections 34 and 35 of the Drug Substances Act 1997, the report dismissed the defendant's objection to the report by the Assistant Chemical Examiner. Because any report submitted by the Assistant Chemical Examiner related to reporting was interpreted by the Government Analyst in the meaning of Sections 34 and 35 of the Drug Substances Act 1997 and deemed acceptable in the evidence. Which objected to the submission of the Franzic Science Laboratory report, as far as Embossing Marx's Absence or absence is concerned, the receiver
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
