O XXXIX, R 2 (3) and section 94 (c) Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 Temporary Order of Prohibition Offenders filed a lawsuit for declaration and permanent injunction in which they granted the defendant a temporary Appealed to stop the ban. The trial court dismissed the construction on the controversial measles number suit. However, the appellate court of the said petition had allowed the applicants to submit a petition for commencement of contempt of court proceedings against the defendant stating that it had violated the order of the appellate court status but excluded it. Was done. Failure to comply with the court order can be resolved / punished under the relevant provisions of the Civil Court Code, but nothing was on record to show that the defendant violated the appellate court order. Defendant's report on the continuation of the construction work was rejected by the court by the respondent, who issued a temporary injunction on the ground that the deficit was not mentioned in the report. The plaintiff in the petition made that he was picking up another measles number that was purchased by him from the court. In compliance with the order, construction work on the suit land was halted and the petition against the defendant to commence contempt proceedings was rightly rejected.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
