Find a Lawyer

ABDUR RASHEED versus ALLAH BAKHSH

Section 115 Re-Jurisdiction The jurisdictional appellate court properly appreciated all the evidence presented by the parties presenting the file and they have come to the correct conclusion. The Syed court neither exercised jurisdiction under the law nor restricted its jurisdiction nor was it authorized under the law. A revocation request for any illegal, irregular, misrepresentative or unreadable proof has been dropped with cost

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• HAMIDULLAH v. Haji SHER AKBAR KHAN 2013 YLR 1676
• ABDUR RAHIM alias RAHIMAY v. State 2013 YLR 1683
• IBAD ULLAH v. Mst. ROIDA GUL BEGUM 2013 CLC 1687
• JAVID v. State 2013 MLD 1691
• JAVED MUSTAFA v. Mst. TAHIRA NASREEN 2013 YLR 1703
• SHER REHMAN v. State 2013 MLD 1703
• ROZI KHAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 1706
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE, PESCO v. QUTAB KHAN 2013 MLD 1709

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

immigration advocates phone number from Mehrab Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes