Find a Lawyer

NASIR HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section O15 (3) (e) and (4) Service Termination Complaint Request Fresh Inquiry Employed After Charge He was dismissed on false pretenses for being absent from duty and investigating and questioning the employee was not given proper and appropriate opportunity to defend himself in the proceedings of the inquiry and The employees were not given patience and their objections were dismissed in a slim way. The statements of the employees and their defense witnesses were not recorded by their Inquiry Officer, they were not recorded by the Inquiry Officer and they were not allowed to bring the Labor Court to a co-worker to assist them. Determine the employee's dismissal order correctly The Labor Court directs that the employer should conduct a new investigation against the employee, by some responsible and experienced person, because the employee was not justified. Inquiries made against the Inquiry Officer are responsible for the mistakes made by the Inquiry Officer. If the image is encountered error. There was no justification for a new inquiry against the employee and his employment, the Labor Court's decision in holding a new inquiry was set aside and the employee was instructed to return to the job with back benefits. Was. best law firms from South Wazirstan lawyer