Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD ALI versus THE STATE

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section O15 (3) (e) and (4) Request for Termination of Service Employee He was arrested in an employee murder case, provided the employer with information regarding his arrest and applied for leave because he was unable to pay his duties. The employee gave his credit employer 205 instead of leave. Was allowed to earn a day off, without notice to the employee, and without a domestic inquiry against him. The order to terminate the Um remained silent as the employees are on leave for a period of 205 days and then the absence of the employee for unpaid leave was not deliberate because of his arrest. In the absence of free employees to attend his duties, under the circumstances, his mismanagement for the purpose of punishing him could not be complied with even if it was co-operation, unlike mismanagement, by dismissing him from employment or He could not have been punished without further domestic investigation against him, the reasons given in the suspension order 20 For more than a year, it was not enough to terminate the service for long. Employee The fate of the employee was hanging in the balance at the end of his employment as he was not finally decided to sue and his case was being prosecuted for the employee's only offense was to terminate his service. The court reasonably found that the order of dismissal was not in accordance with the law best law firm from Khuiratta lawyer