MANAGING DIRECTOR, WATER AND SANITATION AGENCY GUJRANWALA versus KHAWAR NADEEM
Regulation of Section & 33 and (service ()) service complaint application Employees claiming employees filed complaint requests to regularize their services said that they employed employees for 89 days as work charges. had gone. That period of time continued to expand. And since they were temporary employees, they had no option to be summoned regularly by the Labor Court, permitting them to file their grievances with a return from the date of the complaint notice. Continued in service and the interval shown was a matter of artificiality. The employer's authority was not that when 89 days had elapsed, the employees had left the job, the employees continued to serve the employer's authority, although the official order was approved after a day or two, when 89 days. After the expiry of the period, was not considered. In order to disrupt the continuity of their service, employees' complaints applications were allowed back from the date of filing complaints notices, but employees were facing financial crisis along with provincial governments as well as their organizations. Were and have been to their full advantage. The Labor Court had considered every aspect of the case and had passed an order in which the employees should feel satisfied that the Labor Court had given them relief when the circumstances of the case were appropriate. Appears to be in compliance with the orders and may fulfill the set of both appeals. Employers, as well as employees, were dismissed under the circumstances
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2013
