IHSAN ULLAH versus ADMINISTRATIVE IRSHAD TRADERS, GUJRANWALA
Section 2 (xxxi) Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (i) Complaint application, appeal against the status of employees, appeal for employment as a supplier in the respondent establishment The recipient post was removed. After about 3 years of employment, the appellant filed a complaint requesting that he be removed from his job as an employee without any notice and without any investigation the Labor Court dismissed the complaint in which It was stated that since the appellant is a salesman, the Labor Court had no jurisdiction to dismiss his complaint. The trademark was between a typical salesman who delivered the goods to the customer at a fixed price and who was expected to show initiative and drive quality, intelligence and accurate speculation. Ga and for doing so she had some freedom in the process line and was expected to use her mentally to find new ways to promote sales: all said elements recording only evidence. Only then can we ascertain whether the appellant was simple in sales or a sales promotion employee, recording evidence In the circumstances, this was very irrational evidence as the evidence was not recorded, the labor court was remanded with the case to record the evidence and then decide the case again.
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2013
