CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, FAISALABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, FAISALABAD versus NAZIR AHMED
Section 33 and (47 ()) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI 19 1968 19), Section (()) and Section O 15 15 of 15 charged with fraudulent application for employment complaints. And proceedings against it were initiated under section (()). Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 Removed and removed from the job without formal inquiry against them, Department of Appeal filed by employees is pending, Employee filed an appeal before the Federal Service Tribunal Tribunal Relied on the decision of the Supreme Court. Appeals on the basis that it has no jurisdiction because employees of the employer company were not ruled by any legal rules. Following the order of the service tribunal, the employees filed a complaint, which was accepted by the Labor Court and sent back. Regarding the benefits, the employer's lawyer claimed that since the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 removal, removal from the service was allowed, despite any inquiry, the Labor Court failed to enforce the provisions of the said ordinance. It stated that the removal of employees was illegal after the inquiry was dismissed when it was once agreed that the Labor Court had jurisdiction, industrial provisions and commercial employment (standings). Orders) Ordinance, 1968, including Standing Order 15 (4) of the said Ordinance, Service (Special Powers) Arden Instead of being removed from the 2000 Order of Standing, Industrial and Commercial Employment Scheme, the application must be made without exception. Arden, 1968, served the Labor Court (special powers)
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2013
