PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED versus WASIM QAISER
Section 47 Non-prosecution appeal dismissed Appeal for restoration of appeal was pending before the High Court when the appeal was transferred to the Tribunal in the absence of the tribunal, but the appeal was pending. Appellant and Tribunal dismissed non-prosecution appeal for more than one year. The appellant / applicant went into deep sleep and after almost one year filed for reappraisal of the appeal, the effect of which was delayed more than one year was not fully clarified. The delay of each day is being explained, but no compelling or confident explanation for the delay has been made. The appellant had to present to the lawyer that the lawyer who was in charge of the matter before submitting the appeal to the other lawyer did not properly follow it. Matters and were not informed about the removal of the appeal of the illegal prosecutor over time, intentionally or deliberately, may be comforted. Such dispute was dismissed because it was required by law If the lawyer recently involved in the case was not present, then the already engaged lawyer should have taken charge of the case and even if he should have appeared, counsel for the appellant could not appear before the court on the date given. Was, in the absence of a lawyer, the duty to appear for the appellant, the applicant / appellant could not, in any sense, justify Had failed to show the doctor. Absence of his advice or request to reinstate his appeal, denied, dismissed in circumstances r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2013
