Find a Lawyer

DIRECTOR PENSION WAPDA versus ABDUL MAJEED BHATTI

Section 46 Minority Agents Appointment of Minority Grievances Compensation of Work Period Employee joined the employment service when he was about 15 15 years old, while according to the rules, only someone under 18 years of age The individual can be included in the job. The employee of the authority continued to receive his salary from the first day of joining the employee. The employee claimed that he had furnished his responsibilities with the authority, including the tenure of his employer during the minority claim. And the reason was that the minority period should be removed for 2 years. The reason for the service period being promoted by the authority was that the rules allow that the service be allowed to join the service is 18 years, the services made before it were not allowed to be included in the pensionary service where the employer's authority did not Was committed irregularity, the employee can not be punished for such error No person will benefit from the term of his minority employee has been included and has since joined the service. From that day on, the duration of his service should have been calculated App r \ n

Related judgments — Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab, 2013

• PRINCIPAL, SARDAR KAURAY KHAN PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, MUZAFFARGARH v. Mrs. BUSHRA FARASAT 2013 PLC 36
• IMDAD AHMED v. FACTORY MANAGER, NESTLE PRIVATE LIMITED, SHEIKHUPURA 2013 PLC 39
• PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LIMITED v. WASIM QAISER 2013 PLC 44
• CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, FAISALABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED, FAISALABAD v. NAZIR AHMED 2013 PLC 48
• PRESIDENT MCB LIMITED v. MUHAMMAD SHAMS-UZ-ZAMAN 2013 PLC 11
• MANAGING DIRECTOR, WATER AND SANITATION AGENCY GUJRANWALA v. KHAWAR NADEEM 2013 PLC 18
• IHSAN ULLAH v. ADMINISTRATIVE IRSHAD TRADERS, GUJRANWALA 2013 PLC 29

All Labour Appellant Tribunal Punjab judgments of 2013 →

best law firm from Pindi bhohri lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes