MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED versus MST. MUSSARAT MUSHTAQ
Earlier, the Appellate Bank had not filed an appeal against the Labor Court's proportional decision within 30 days, and instead challenged the High Court in a constitutional petition, which was pending and Appeal was presented to the Applicant after more than 11 years, after the delay of 42 days from the settlement of the constitutional application, the Appellant, without giving any explanation for the delay, consider that the matter has been in the wrong forum for more than 11 years. / Pending before the High Court, the appellant bank should have been more vigilant. And should have filed an appeal without further damages, if any party failed to approach the competent court within the stipulated time, unless the delay of each day was specified, which would have caused Cannot be paid. The appeal was timed and there was no reason to apologize for the delay; the appeal was dismissed, under circumstances \ r \ n