Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

BAGH ALI versus MST. AYESHA


Section 12 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Constitution of Pakistan, Section 185 (3) Suitless Pendants for Specific Performance, Applicable Scope Suit Principles for Controversial Property Prior to its Prohibited Purchase, Specific Performance Disputes The suit for the property contained was filed by the trial court by the plaintiff / defendant, after which it was affirmed by the appellate court and the defendant's appeal was dismissed. Defendant's confession was that he was a sincere buyer without notice and could not be sued for specific performance. He did not deny that the specific performance case for the disputed property was filed in 1992, while the defendant Ali allegedly purchased the said property in 1993, while the defendant's case was affected by the principle of the lease pendenza decision, and the orders passed by the courts below were disputed. Was denied and the leave was denied \ r \ n

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Mamu kunjan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.