MRS. KAUSAR A. GHAFFAR versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB
Section 4 (1) (b) Promotion Policy, 2010, Para 12 (1) Promotion, Fitness, Service Tribunal for the Selection Board Disqualifying Selection Employees from Promotion from BS 20 Appeal against this order of the Selection Board before. BS21 was considered by the Selection Board but they were dismissed on the basis that they were unable to progress as they had achieved only 70% of the 100 marks, while for BS21 development. A limit of at least 75 was required. Paragraph 12 (1) of the Promotion Policy, 2010, before the dismissal of the service tribunal, was filed by the petitioner that he was ignored by the selection board and that the recommendations of the selection board were instituted by the provincial chief. Reflect that. The secretary, who chaired the board's accuracy selection board, did not find the applicant able to develop the promotion policy, due to the quality of the regulations set forth in 2010. It did not receive the minimum percentage required for development in BS 21 that was properly considered by the Selection Board with the applicant and did not find it appropriate that the matter was meritoriously No, the applicant's fitness will be promoted, which question cannot be the subject of appeal in view of Section 4 (1) (b) of the Punjab Service Tribunal 1974; the duties attributed to the Provincial Chief Secretary were ambiguous, irregular and There can be no basis for interfering with the authorized order. Appeal for leave of application for promotion of applicant's fitness assessment board was dismissed \ r \ n \ r \ n
