Section 13A (1) (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 103 unauthorized possession of weapons and rockets, etc. Appreciating the evidence recovered weapons / ammunition on the suspect's identity while the police witnesses in the police custody, the scope of private witnesses during the recovery of evidence of the scope non association was in the custody of the police in connection with a crime and during the interrogation. Police were reportedly taken to a place where he had hidden a large amount of weapons / ammunition, including a rocket launcher trial court, and the accused was sentenced. The appeal filed by the accused before the Section 13A (1) (C) High Court of Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965 was also dismissed. The defendants' conviction was that there was serious prejudice to their defense because they were not represented by a lawyer before the High Court. That none of the people were reportedly involved in the recovery. He was allegedly recovered while in police custody, and that he was involved in the current case because he wanted to take legal action against the police in order to commit a fake police encounter. His defense lawyer provided every opportunity to examine the prosecution's witnesses. During the current appeal proceedings, the accused's lawyer was heard at length and the entire evidence was assessed, therefore, any charges of prejudice that led to the acquittal were recovered from a hidden place. The public is inaccessible to the public and such place was in the knowledge of the accused, who himself had indicated that the recovered arms / ammunition was in his possession and controlled. On
