SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA versus SYED SHAMSHER KHAN
Arts 212 (3) and 25 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 (1) Civil Service Overtime Allowance, Equal Pay for Overtime Allowance \ Equal Pay for Equal Work, Applicable Service Tribunal Principle, The jurisdictional drivers working with provincial finance tribunal members of the jurisdictional jurisdictional tribunal were working when drivers associated with high court judges were allowed overtime allowances and provincial secretariat respondents claimed similar overtime allowances. , Which was also denied by the Treasury Department's appeal to the respondents. Failing, they then filed appeals before the Service Tribunal, which allowed, and found that the defendants were entitled to the Overtime Allowance from the Provincial Government / Applicant to the Overseas Allowance to Respondents to the Service Tribunal. There was no jurisdiction to grant, and they did not deserve the Respondent Overtime Allowance because they did not bother with the extension of the service tribunal's jurisdiction over matters related to the terms and conditions of service, respondents for the overtime allowance. The denial of the claim was a final order and a pretext, provided it served them Rayt and relevant regulations. The Finance Department did not rule out the fact that the respondents were working overtime and their job was similar to that of the drivers who were given overtime allowances in the provincial government, especially over time because of a reasonable rating. Did not request to be denied the allowance. The service tribunal could not be considered and the meaning of Article 1212 (3) of the Constitution to guarantee interference
