MAULANA ABDUL HAQUE BALOCH versus GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN
R98 and Part III Balochistan Mineral Rules, 2002, Mines and Oil Fields and Mineral Development (Government Control) Act (XXIV of 1948), Section 2 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 196 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts ? (185) ) And ? Exp Exp ()) The joint venture search agreement between the government of Balochistan, copper / gold mining exploration license and mining lease, etc. in Balochistan province, completed the search for the legal respondent company, after which Submitted a request. However, the request before the Mine Committee to approve the lease of the mine was rejected, the appeal filed against the Mining Committee's order was also dismissed by the relevant department, both saying that the legal status of the joint venture agreement by the respondent company And relaxation in the Balochistan mining concession was not challenged. The rules made by the government of Balochistan were challenged by the High Court of High Court in 1970 that the joint venture agrees with the Balochistan Mining Concession Rules, a concession made in 1970, which was originally a joint venture research agreement Implementation between the research company and the Balochistan Development Authority was encountered, some legal flaws were encountered, therefore, one of the accused was executed, significant changes were made to the agreement as the interests of the parties were transferred. Or was allowed for the assignment, or partly for the aforementioned podium Services Balochistan was made to the joint venture partner and BDA was represented as his representative. Former Agent Serious Questionnaire marks were obtained by the agency's validation, including the Contract Act, 187
