THE STATE THROUGH MEHMOOD AHMED BUTT versus SHARAF-UD-DIN SHEIKH
The High Court dismissed the non-verdict in the appeal against the verdict of the accused filed under section 7 417, Article ? 185 (185) of the Constitution of Pakistan, stating that the trial court's decision was in accordance with the law. That was, once an accused was acquitted by a competent court, the case was double-charged with innocence, and that no interference was required in the trial court's decision whether the High Court's non- Being a Speaker, was the decision permanent? In the view of the law, although rejecting the appeal against the verdict, the High Court applied the principle of double confession of innocence, in view of the order of acquittal by the trial court, but in the circumstances of this case the High Court found the fact In addition to the legal aspects of the case, the decision should be considered in favor of the accused before the decision is required to be re-written to the High Court, based on the material available on the record. The appeal for leave was changed and allowed, and accordingly his case is pending in the High Court. Was