AGHA INAM-UR-REHMAN KHAN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Section 5 (a) Punjab Civil Servants Act (VII of 1974), Article 21 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 105 and 192 Civil Judge's Dismissal Governor Legal Appeal Banned Appeal Civil Judge (Appellant) Dismissed by the competent authority / History 93000 2000 The Chief Justice of the ruling under the High Court order was informed to the civil judge in question 23 3 2000, and he appealed to the Chief Justice of the High Court, whose appeal An appeal was filed before it was returned to the jurisdictional forum in this case for a proper presentation before the civil judge then presented a motion before the governor, which was rejected. After a three month break to Section 5 (a) Terms 19 7 2000 filed a new appeal before the Tribunal. The Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal Act, 1991 Syed Appeal was dismissed as a time-barred dispute by the Civil Judge pursuant to Section 21 (2) of the Punjab Civil S, that the Aventis Act, 1974 was the method of representation next. The authority to order the expulsion from the dismissal was already usable. That the Governor of the province had the authority over the Chief Justice of the High Court, who approved the dismissal order, therefore, a proper and appropriate request for representation was made before the Governor, which was not decided in 90 days. He was forced to take advantage. His (latest) right to appeal, which was periodically filed by the High Court Chief Justice in his capacity, was granted by the competent authority on 3 3, 2000, and therefore, he (the Chief Justice) was heard. Was not an option The appeal was filed before the Chief Justice of the High Court, nor was it presented to the forum holding jurisdiction.
