Find a Lawyer

SECRETARY, IRRIGATION AND WORKS, LAHORE versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD

Maintaining the Complaint Petition, the Labor Court accepted the petitioner's complaint request through its decision in section 2 (xxviii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 and section 25 (1) (b) of the 25A Punjab Civil Servants Act (1974). And ordered it as a tube service. Put aside the appointment of a good driver and defendant who was directly appointed to this position, restoring the legality and application of the complaint The applicant, who was an illiterate man, was initially employed as a Greek by promotion and promotion. At the time I could claim the appointment as a footer or mechanic. The tube wheel driver for which the minimum qualification was passed in the middle exam was not a development post, but purely a recruiting respondent who was assigned as a tube wheel driver matriculation. Cannot be reversed as set forth in Section 2. (1) (b) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, a forum capable of resolving this group, was the service tribunal if it wanted to enforce its rights of service and apply for the appointment of a defendant for a particular position. If the complaint filed by the payer does not accept the complaint request, it is not a labor court. advocates from Dera Bugti lawyer