AHMED versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3a) Maintaining Complaint Request Employee whose services were terminated on location \ F filed a complaint with the Labor Court located on location - L \ Labor Court L which filed the complaint which was filed for submission to the competent court, the best way for the employees to approach the Labor Court at the place where the action was taken was in their favor. Was born and the Labor Court employee LER was wrongly referred to the Employer Labor Court. ??? In the circumstances, under the circumstances, the appropriate jurisdiction in refusing to entertain the case and in exercising a proper jurisdiction has returned an appropriate and reasonable order, to return the complaint request for submission to the Court of Labor Appellate Tribunal. But could not find the error in their personal status or the order was approved by the Labor Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Kotri lawyer