DIRECTOR, ADMINISTRATION AND CO-ORDINATION, FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, FAISALABAD versus SHAKEEL AHMAD SHAHID
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Section Oz 1 (1) and termination of 12 employees whose services are in writing without order and without other legal restrictions. Without being terminated. According to the express condition contained in the employee's letter of appointment, the appointment was formally made against the leave vacant that his services would be terminated automatically by the other employee on duty restoration at the place he was currently employed. When joining a job against leave vacancy, another employee who joined on leave and who had been appointed as employee was unable to insist on continuity in service and could not apply. Was that in the general case he could benefit from an employee who was a contractual employee and his status Was not received Permanent employee, cannot be allowed to evade their own obvious commitment to employee whose service is auto-terminated on the second employee's re-employment to the point that he was temporarily discharged. Assigned against Assamese, he could not claim that he had attained permanent employment status and that he could not be removed from the job unless he followed the prescribed procedure.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer