CHAIRMAN, AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, WAPDA, GUJRANWALA versus MUHAMMAD SAFDAR, LINE SUPERINTENDENT-I, WAPDA CONSTRUCTION SUB-DIVISION, NAROWAL
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 22A (8) (b) Upon filing an application against the charge sheet by the employees appointed by the previous order, the notice was issued by the employer to appear on the due date, but After any employer appeared on the due date for the hearing, the application filed by the employee was accepted and the charge sheet issued to him by the employer was assigned to the former partner. The notice of application filed by the employer was given to the employee and the member to determine the ex parte order by the employer; the National Industrial Relations Commission set aside the ex parte order against the employer and decided the case for a merit hearing. Gone, but the date set for a hearing in absentia was changed. The employer's case was adjourned from time to time, and the member, the National Industrial Relations Commission, withdrew his order according to which the former or Dare was set aside. In the absence of the employer, such order was called back. The retention was not permanent, as the Member, the National Industrial Relations Commission did not have the authority to review the earlier order, was approved by the Member, the order for the withdrawal of the National Industrial Relations Commission was set aside. After issuing the notice to, the remand for a fresh verdict was obtained
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
