Find a Lawyer

MUBARAK ALI, STORE HELPER, C.J. LINK DIVISION, WAPDA COLONY, CHASHMA KUNDIAN, DISTRICT MIANWALI versus REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, SARGODHA DIVISION

Sections 7,22A (8) (B) and 22A (9) (A) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, the fresh applicant / applicant claimed that he was elected for two years and did not participate in the elections. The respondents who prepared the fraudulent action prepared and forwarded those acts to the registrar, trade unions, who entertained, saying that due to political pressure the registrar of trade unions was illegal. The applicant / appellant had prayed that the Registrar, trade unions be instructed not to accept fraudulent proceedings and do no further injustice. The National Industrial Relations Commission, a member of the Labor Practices, directed the trade registrar, trade unions to investigate the matter and send a report. The matter was investigated and a report was sent, based on the aforementioned report, Member, National Industrial The Relations Commission directed the registrar, trade unions, to select the union within a specified period. Applicant / Appellant filed an appeal against the order of the Member Member National Industrial Relations Commission is praying for the order to be removed, the trade unions inquired and reported on the direction of the Member, National Industrial Relations Commission. On the basis of this report, the selection process of both groups was rejected and accordingly both were informed of the request. It should have been settled by the applicant / applicant whose fruit was born, but instead the National Industrial Relations Commission, inaccurately instructed the Member National Registry Trade Union to issue a controversial election period. Order approved by member upon expiration jobs for advocates from Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer