GENERAL MANAGER, TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION, LAHORE REGION, LAHORE versus JAMALUDDIN, TELEPHONE TECHNICIAN,P.T.C., LAHORE
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 S: 22A (8) (G) and 22D Employees unfair labor practice orders to recover money from employees The Siddiqui employee, who was ordered to recover some money, challenged the same charge. Was that he had been hunted. His legitimate trade union activities were calculated after the issuance of an appropriate charge sheet to the employee and inquiry was made against the employee for the misappropriation of the closed telephone numbers by the charge of telephone charges against him and against him. The order of inquiry was properly considered by the competent appellate authority and it was rejected. , But the Member, the National Industrial Relations Commission, allowed the application of the employee filed under the non-written order under section 22A (8) (g), the Industrial Relations Ordinance, and ordered the employees to impose a collection of money. Put aside. E, in favor of, Member of the National Industrial Relations Commission, was issued the order mployee, was set aside
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Naukot lawyer