Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PAK. P.W.D. CENTRAL CIVIL DIVISION NO.3,LAHORE versus RIZWAN ALI


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 1 (3) (b), 15, 22A (8) (g) and 22b (3) (a) West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Order) Ordinance (VI of 1968), Sec. O l (b) and 12 (3) National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regln 32 (i) Salary withholding and termination of employment unfairly employed by employees who are initially held permanent positions. Was set on a temporary basis. , Continued to perform its duties and satisfactorily completed the three-month trial period, regarding the issue which, by law, the employees of the West Pakistan Department of Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance. B) are made permanent in accordance with clause. In 1960, his salary for two months was first withheld by the employer, and then his services were terminated without assigning any reason, more than a year after his appointment to the job. Was not employed on a charge-based basis, as the employer has alleged, the UT was appointed on a permanent basis on a temporary basis against the permanent post Employees were paid on a monthly basis with no deductions for leave and There was no difference in his employment which the employees completed satisfactorily for the three months, became permanent worker services. Yes. Contrary to the employee's request for withholding the employee's salary and termination of his services could not be specifically terminated. It was alleged by the employer that the employer was affiliated with the department, and not the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Applicable and Employee was not entitled to file a dispute

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
lawer from fb area from Sidhnoti lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.