Find a Lawyer

MOOR AHMAD versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB .

The Colonial Law of the Public Land (Punjab) Act 1912 Section 10 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 the respondent was given the property rights of the land under his cultivation as a tenant of the land, after which The collector requested that a lambarder be appointed at the death of his father. The petitioner's request was rejected on this request because of the question of underground, proprietary rights where the respondents were given the name, to be revoked and the revenue to be approved by the Board of Revenue. That was not secured as a grant. But under the cultivation of the defendant as a tenant, according to the land grant policy he was given the property rights rightly, the petitioner challenged the order of the acquisition of revenue in the civil court through the case of the Delaware suit Petitioner. Likewise, his appeal was dismissed by the trial court and the appellate court. The final conclusions cannot be interfered with with the courts below the accuracy, respectively, no evidence was presented to the courts below this jurisdiction, which was allotted to the liberty scheme. Ownership rights were transferred to the respondent on a property basis before becoming a grantee, the applicant may apply. Do not claim it especially when it was not in the possession of the respondents at any time while the land under the possession was in the possession of the respondents as the tenant order of the claimant who gave the proprietary rights to the plaintiff was never challenged by the applicant. So, this order was found. The ultimate right c immigration advocates contact from Amangarh lawyer