BUSHRA QASIM KHAN versus ABDUL RASHID
Article 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964, objected to the issue of maintaining the constitutional petition, which according to this decision is a fair hearing, the applicant took advantage of the controversial and alternative alternative method. Is. On the question of pure jurisdiction, the High Court may enjoy constitutional petition, irrespective of the availability of alternative remedies, such rules, however, were not attracted to the applicant's case that the applicant had filed a suit with the Family Court. The jurisdiction was not objected to, the perpetual question raised by the petitioner was raised after a question was emphasized against the validity of the decree for the first time in the High Court points, so that the appeal could be easily and competently adopted. A constitutional application can also be dismissed on the basis that the matter is without objection to the court It was acknowledged and addressed to the parties on matters of merit, the High Court did not reject it on such important and decisive question as to the merits of the dispute. [Jurisdiction]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Kunjah lawyer