Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD versus COLLECTOR LAHORE

In Constitution of Pakistan 14 and 16 (1973), Article 199 Applicants Acquisition In 1960, applicants received compensation for their acquired land, and the case was closed by past and closed transaction applicants in 1986, more than two decades ago. The first time the petition was received before the Board of Revenue for the purpose of reclaiming the land occupied by a landowner was an objectionable Board of Revenue rejected applicants for the same application. The application was rejected for this purpose. The proposal to abandon the land acquired by the department claiming the restoration of their acquired land in 1994 must be incomplete and vague and must come from the beneficiaries of the acquisition. The beneficiary should say that the land in question was no longer needed and in this case it has to be handed over. No more holidays and compulsions can be relinquished than the Collector. It was only from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors that it was demanded that the incident took place in 1980, in which the Board of Directors sought to eliminate the cause. The decision was made for which the question was received underground, and the usual property was to dispose of immovable property. If the question of relinquishing the power of the decision of the Board of Directors can be decided, it is proposed to relinquish the land under the meaning of R14 (1); The provisions of 1983 cannot be estimated. For the purpose of allowing the agency to deviate from the original purpose for some time and return to the same acquisition agency. top advocates from Hujra Shah Muqeem lawyer