KHAN MUHAMMAD versus HAMEED-UR-REHMAN
O XLI, R 27 Extra Evidence Verification of Production at the Appeal Stage The acceptance of such request by the First Appeal, with the court illegally accepting such request and with its material irregularities, Appellate Court was not guaranteed to act. Such an application is meant to provide opportunities for the defendants whose hands were fraudulently purchased by the person who purchased the land in question, in the name of the person who had already purchased it in his name. The name was purchased to fill the lacuna in their case. The evidence, which was tried by the evidence, stated that the petition was not submitted before the tenders of the tender court; at the appeal stage it was not entitled to present additional evidence, the first appellate court not only the material Regularly exercised its jurisdiction, but also failed to take advantage of it. Plaintiff to present evidence to respondent
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Kakul lawyer