INTERNAITONAL CREDIT AND INVESTMENT CO. versus ATTOCK OIL CO. LTD
Code of Conduct 1908 O XXVI, R 5 & 5 115 The refusal of the court to appoint a commission for the examination of witnesses in a foreign country; for a fair and equitable decision of a civil suit, the examination of such witness was necessary for the question of delay. Took into consideration the following was not as important as the commission had already been appointed by the trial court in the second civil suit that Justice could not be sacrificed at the technical altar and therefore could not be avoided for justice. The appointment of the Commission was appropriate and appropriate for the examination of the witness. The proper decision of the case was a controversial order denying the appointment of a commission illegally, which led to a misunderstanding of justice and was not sustainable. The decision of the civil court to refuse the appointment of a commission was a decision of the case which was filed under section 115 of the High Court. The revision was jurisdictional, CPC was a trial court. According to the law directed to appoint a commission without further delay
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
