EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBEWELL DIVISION SCARP, NAUSHERO FEROZE versus MUHAMMAD RAFIQ
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) Payment of Payment Act (IV of 1936), the Labor Court holding Section 17 revision which was earlier filed against the authority order under the Payment of Wages Act It was directed to submit the disputed amount to the employer / appellant within 30 days of the court, but such order of the appellate court was not complied with by the appellant / employer which would otherwise have been fixed by the employer 30 Was filed in addition to the day period, which was dismissed by the appellate court for non-compliance with the provisions of section 17. The Dispute Payment Act, 1936 was also not entered into the dispute deposit submission certificate, with its request for review by the employer. Appeal court rightly dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the law, the request for review was not feasible, in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Astore lawyer
