Service Tribunal Sindh — Judgments of 1995

13 reported judgments of the Service Tribunal Sindh from 1995.

  • HABIBUR REHMAN SHAIKH v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIKARPUR 1995 PLC(CS) 265

    Section 4 job dismissal A public servant is not pressing for a job appeal, but praying for a reduction in fines will serve as a permanent bar and a 20-year-old young public servant, Umar Umar, for fut…

  • RAFQUE AHMAD KOLACHI v. GOVENRMENT OF SINDH 1995 PLC(CS) 454

    Sections 9 and 24 of the Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1977), Section 8 government employees' seniority first, who initially joined as an ad hoc-based medical officer and whose service took place almost…

  • TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI v. HASHIM 1995 PLC(CS) 471

    On the recommendation of the Section 4 Department Promotion Committee (DPC), the exclusion of the name of a civil servant, a police officer, in the F-list on the jurisdiction of the Tribunal List F, i…

  • MUHAMMAD ASIF v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH 1995 PLC(CS) 687

    Section 23 (1) Police Rules, 1934, R16 09 (2) Appealing to a Public Employee, who was a police officer, the competent authority sentenced the accused to major penalties for compulsory retirement. Inst…

  • GHULAM RABBANI v. GHANDHARA NISSAN (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI 1995 PLC(CS) 692

    The assertion of 5, 9, 13 and 16 appointments under the Sindh Assembly Secretariat (Recruitment) Rules 1974, whereby a Government servant was appointed as the Additional Secretary to the Assembly by t…

  • ZAHID ALI v. CHIEF S CRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1995 PLC(CS) 882

    Sections 8 and 9 Sindh Government Employees (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1973, R10 (1) The civil servants' tors of government employees who initially joined the department as inspector…

  • KARIM BUX KHUABRO v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH KARACHI 1995 PLC(CS) 893

    Delay in filing an appeal can be delayed by the Tribunal either by relief of the Tribunal or by the Government employees suffering trauma in both cases before the first Tribunal has to terminate the d…

  • SIKANDAR ALI SHAH v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH KARACHI 1995 PLC(CS) 915

    4 The penalty for removal from office was the reduction of the penalty for dismissal from a government employee on account of negligence in performing his official duties; no doubt, on account of this…

  • MUHAMMAD LATIF v. INSPE OR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH, KARACHI 1995 PLC(CS) 1061

    Sacked from job 3, 6 and 12 A government employee was given a show cause notice for being a police officer, which had the usual allegations and the government employee submitted his response, one of t…

  • MUHAMMAD RIAZ v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1995 PLC(CS) 1067

    R 9 7 A change of public servant who was a police officer, his sentence was retired after age The public servant challenged the date of his appointment when he entered the medical records of his servi…

  • ZARINA AKHTAR v. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, HEALTH DEPARTMENT, KARACHI 1995 PLC(CS) 1132

    BRS17 was regularly promoted to BPS 17 as a tutor, before being promoted from a civil servant to a nursing superintendent as a senior with a civil servant. Despite this, the employee was shown junior.…

  • ABDUL QAYOOM. SOOMRO v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1995 PLC(CS) 1137

    Article 189 Civil Service Decision The case of a government employee bound by other courts to a tribunal who filed an appeal before the tribunal is a co-government employee who was successful in obtai…

  • FAZALULLAH UNAR v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1995 PLC(CS) 1182

    The appeal regarding the limitation of section 4 appeal was filed one year after the issuance of anonymous notification and the appellant government employee had no valid reason to offer such delay wa…

Other years — Service Tribunal Sindh

2014 · 2013 · 2011 · 2010 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976

Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.