Service Tribunal Sindh — Judgments of 1980
46 reported judgments of the Service Tribunal Sindh from 1980.
- JAMEEL AHMED BHUTTO v. THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1980 PLC(CS) 10
R 5 (3) Non-inquiry by the inquiry officer or inquiry committee cannot be exercised at the discretion of the authorized officer nor should it be used in a disciplined and responsible manner as per the…
- TAJ MUHAMMAD QURESHI v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 368
It is not one of the terms and conditions of service read with Section 4, Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), Sections 3 and 8 and Sindh Service Tribunal (Code of Conduct), 1974, r 23 and is not e…
- DR. MUHAMMAD MEMON v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 369
The Section 4 Limited Order is scheduled for a hearing within 30 days…
- DR. ABDUL MAJID MEMON v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 371
Section 4, read with the Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), Section 8 (1) is not an authorized right of the Seniority Services Tribunal to be unable to prove or establish anything which is a seni…
- QAMARUDDIN v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 400
Payment of Promotion and Existing Charge Distribution Order (i) Indication of Appointment to the High Office (ii) Officer's Officer (iii) Claiming Sanity on Appointment of His Elders to Perform Duties…
- MUHAMMAD UMAR v. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION 1980 PLC(CS) 491
Section 2 (b) (i) and Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 reads with the rules of public servants (competence and discipline), 1973 Corporate bodies employees are not government employees, …
- M. K. JASKANI v. MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE 1980 PLC(CS) 495
The pay order which is issued and executed on a specific pay scale cannot be modified at the loss of a public servant. Appellant has approved salary scale of Rs. 1,150 for 8 years.…
- S. M. TEHSEEN TAQVI v. CENSUS COMMISSIONER CENSUS ORGANISATION, KARACHI 1980 PLC(CS) 499
RR 2 (2), (3) and 5 (2) were read with notification number section RO 1562 (1/73) on November 7, 1977, the charge issued by the officer has not yet been assigned to the authorized officer's authority.…
- ABDUL WALI M. J. MAKHDOOM v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 517
Section 4 Review The decision of the tribunal review application against such order is not upheld…
- DR. MAHMOOD v. CHIEF-SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 530
Section 4 read with Martial Law Order 1977 [CMLA] No] No 23, against the order approved by the Martial Law Administrator on the review board recommendations made under MLO 23 is not appropriate.…
- SIKANDER ALI SAMEJO v. GHULAM MOHAMMED BHAMBHRO 1980 PLC(CS) 542
An arrest of a competent authority may not be granted before the tribunal when it is found fit for appointment to a particular post for appeal appointment before the section 4 tribunal.…
- WAJIHUDDIN v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 543
Section 4, read with the Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), orders for the abolition of section 11 service to record publication without any element of instability indicating any inquiry or showc…
- SUKHDEV v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 543
Response to Section 8, Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 seniority vest not to be aggravated in appeal before the Right Service Tribunal…
- ABDUL HAMEED v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, HYDERABAD 1980 PLC(CS) 545
Section 4 No Suspension Penalty Does Not Affect Terms and Conditions of Service No Appeal is Against Suspension…
- MRS. M. J. B. SHAH v. SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF SIND, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 550
Section 4 victims did not enforce the appeal and were not admitted for hearing and were summarily dismissed.…
- Shaikh MUSLEHUDDIN v. I. G. OF POLICE, SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 552
Rr 5, Proviso & 8 (b) Applicable to Rule 5 (b) in the interest of the security of Pakistan or any part thereof, without purpose and defense opportunity 8 (b) envisages a situation where the representa…
- MUHAMMAD AYUB v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 557
The outcome of the disciplinary proceedings based on the statement of a witness is not based on personal knowledge but on the statements of witnesses who later defied the allegations in the circumstan…
- DR. ABDUL MAJEED MEMON v. CIVIL SURGEON, HYDERABAD 1980 PLC(CS) 560
Authorized Permanent Travel Allowance Grant at the discretion of the competent authority is based on the claim that as a matter of fact it cannot be claimed that the appellant has to appear in court 4…
- TALIB HUSSAIN ZAIDI v. CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS 1980 PLC(CS) 571
The preliminary period for Section Limitation appeals can only be extended within 30tend days if departmental appeals are required and in fact the appeal will be filed after the expiry of 120 days, ti…
- ANWAR ALI v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 571
Section 13 (i) read with the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1974), there will be no penalty in retirement / service at the completion of section 4 25 years nor will any sole competent authority ha…
- M. A. SHAIKH v. CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 572
Sections 3 and 8 are read with the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), section 4 and the Sindh Service Tribunals (Code of Conduct) 1974, r. There is no right of seniority, nor can a terms and co…
- MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN KHAN v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 575
On the order of the High Court to be passed on 21 6 1979, the order for the termination of section 6 of the court is not pending in the High Court, which violates the validity of the section 6 appeal …
- MUKHTAR AHMAD JUNEJO v. CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 576
The rights of seniority are not conferred by law with respect to any special seniority read with sections 3 and 8 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), section 4 and Sindh Service Tribunals…
- SHAMSHAD HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HOME DEPARTMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 579
Section 4 reads with Sindh Civil Servants Appeal Rules 1975, the right to appeal from the appropriate authority cannot be obtained from the appellate court; After the appeal is not filed before the po…
- MUHAMMAD HASSAN v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF PRISONS 1980 PLC(CS) 584
The Retirement Prison Warden essentially slapped the prisoner under Misconduct in the case and admitted that there was no proposal to attack the prisoner while giving him the right to self defense, es…
- MUHAMMAD PUNJAL MANGI v. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD, HYDERABAD REGION 1980 PLC(CS) 585
Section Transfer Order No transfer officer for a transfer or transfer of office to a particular position did not return from the Executive Cadre to the Ministerial Cadre to which he or she is transfer…
- ZAFAR ALI v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE 1980 PLC(CS) 594
The status and condition of any service read with Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1973), Sections 3 and 8 cannot be claimed at any particular place. Rules of entitled Sindh Service Tribunal…
- MUTTAQQI HASSAN RIZVI v. PROVINCE OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 597
Section 4 Departmental Appeal Appeal to the Wrong Forum An Appellant Chief Secretary, who did not maintain an appeal before the Tribunal in charge of Irrigation and Electricity, as Chief Secretary in …
- KARIM BUX v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 603
App Applicant praying to withdraw Appellant's appeal was returned…
- DR. ABDUL MAJEED MEMON v. HEALTH SECRETARY 1980 PLC(CS) 617
Section 8, read with the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (X of 1973), prohibited in connection with matters relating to the sanity appeal under section 4 of the Tribunal's Section 4 Seniority Curate of Si…
- IRSHAD ALI v. SECRETARY FOOD 1980 PLC(CS) 619
Section 4 Appellant is required to file a departmental appeal against a defective order within one month of its issuance and if the department has not filed the decision within 90 days after the autho…
- MUTTAQQI HASSAN RIZVI v. SIND PROVINCE 1980 PLC(CS) 620
Read with R2 (k) Sindh Civil Servants (Appeal) Rules, Rule 3 of 1975, Sr. No. 4, Secretary for Schedule of Appeal under R2 (k) of Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion and Exchange) Rules. Incl…
- S. NAZIM HUSSAIN v. SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE HYDERABAD 1980 PLC(CS) 624
The Con Con controversy is that since the appellant worked in the deputy commissioner's office of the city deputy collector, the sentence was granted to the deputy commissioner, and Commissioner Karac…
- ISHRAT YAR KHAN v. SIND PROVINCE 1980 PLC(CS) 625
Under section 4 read with the Civil Servant (Appeal) Rules 1975, instead of filing an appeal against the order of the IG Police of the successor to represent the same LG police and to reject the Secre…
- DR. ABDUS SALAM v. SECRETARY, EDUCATION 1980 PLC(CS) 627
Section 4 seniority respondents who are junior to Appellant at the lower level cannot be senior only because their promotion takes effect before the date of Appellant's advertisement appointed in Sind…
- MUHAMMAD UMAR v. SIND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION 1980 PLC(CS) 629
Section 4, Removal of Services The Secretary of the Public Service Commission is not entitled to approve the removal of the applicant from employment because he is the only authority who has complaine…
- NABI BUX v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KHAIRPUR 1980 PLC(CS) 631
Section II The decision to delay the second appeal is a contention that the appellant preferred the second appeal in the Board of Revenue, during which period the service tribunal should be excluded f…
- GHULAM QADIR v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KHAIRPUR 1980 PLC(CS) 643
Section 4 (1) of the Civil Servants Act (XIV of 1974) reads, Retirement Commissioner is not deciding the issue of app paint retirement on the charge of mismanagement, but under section 13 (1) of the G…
- FAZALUDDIN v. CHIEF SECRETARY, SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 652
Section Lim Applicant is aware of his removal notification from National Pay Scale Number from from 1 Apply to the Chief Secretary 1 month after the issuance of the notification although the appellant…
- MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MEMON v. SIND GOVERNMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 667
Section 8 claims of sanity related to sanity…
- BABUL KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 678
Employees of Karachi Port Trust, neither the civil servant nor the civil service pension rolls for the Special Central Constabulary Force of the special government administered by the Port Town are en…
- GHULAM QADIR v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KHAIRPUR 1980 PLC(CS) 679
The claim cannot be made about the appointment message in the civil service or the relaxation of the fixed age, which cannot be claimed as a discretion of the right to refer the government to the serv…
- IDREES AHMED KHAN v. CHIEF ENGINEER, IRRIGATION SUKKUR REGION 1980 PLC(CS) 680
Section & Act was read with the Limitation Act (I 190) with IX, Section Imp Impound Order 3 197 197 197 2 197 Constitution2 challenged before the High Court on 29 29 197 197 2 197 Constitution Constit…
- MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AHMED KHAN LODHI v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SIND, HOME DEPARTMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 680
Section 4 Appeals challenging promotion order requiring reopening of seniority victims, appeal not implemented; Weakness was encountered and in addition, they were not able to be cared for properly.…
- YOUSIF ALI v. DIRECTOR, HEALTH SERVICES. 1980 PLC(CS) 691
Section App Appellant removes illegally old and unusable records from his office premises without the knowledge of his superior officers, and after recording his sale illegally, the record and proceed…
- MUHAMMAD SULEMAN JUNEJO v. CHIEF SECRETARY, SIND 1980 PLC(CS) 694
Section 4, Read with the Sindh Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1973, r 5 (3) Appellant, a civil judge, on appeal against his dismissal from employment: himself; (ii) The judicial …
Other years — Service Tribunal Sindh
2014 · 2013 · 2011 · 2010 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.