Service Tribunal Sindh — Judgments of 1992
25 reported judgments of the Service Tribunal Sindh from 1992.
- M.S. TARIQ v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 43
Rr 13 1 & 13 17 (2) The authority of the police inspector general to review or modify the orders of his predecessor was not authorized to review or revise the orders of the advisers. The general polic…
- DOST MUHAMMAD CHANDIO v. DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE 1992 PLC(CS) 64
Section 4 Sindh Police (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1988, Rr 4 and 7 (2) Recruitment of Inquiry Officer from the job The secret inquiry was resorted to, which led to a huge fine against the appellan…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN BALOCH v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 89
A civil servant, a tax officer, recovered heroin from the accused public servant after detecting two cases, after which he deliberately disappeared from the property, so the accused could be acquitted…
- LAL BUX SOOMRO v. CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 121
Section 4 Appeal to the Competitive Appeal Service Tribunal was to be filed within thirty days of communication from the Department of Appeal dismissed by the public servant claiming that the order of…
- MOINUL ISLAM v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 138
Appeal to section 4 departmental remedies before going to service tribunal, before filing an appeal before the service tribunal without resorting to a compulsory government employee department appeal,…
- MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 147
Section 4 Appeals Against Negative Comments The allegations of personal prejudice against the recording officer are incapable of appearing on record Some of the petitions filed against the reporting o…
- SABIR ALI KHAN v. SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF SINDH HOME DEPARTMENT 1992 PLC(CS) 150
Section 2 (1) and 8 (3) Sindh Civil Servants (Promotion, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1973, R10 (1) Development of D-Section P Cadre Mode to determine the respondents appointed by the initial recr…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD BHANBHARO v. CHIEF SECRETARY 1992 PLC(CS) 162
Article 4 Exemption qualifying test for civil service promotion was later withdrawn Individuals did not qualify for the scope of conditions under which the exemption for qualifying examination to prom…
- MUHAMMAD ZARDAD v. COMMISSIONER, KARACHI 1992 PLC(CS) 171
R6 (1) Sindh Service Tribunals Act (1 of 1974), Section 4 Thirty-three days after the order of the Department of Appeal to the Service Tribunal before dismissing the appeal of the Government employee'…
- MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH, KARACHI 1992 PLC(CS) 173
Only one of the eight charges against the police officer was recommended by the R4 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974), the Section 4 Police Officer Inquiry Officer, on the hefty fines and reducti…
- SHAKILUR REHMAN HAMIDI v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 335
Section 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 Sindh Civil Servants (Promotion, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, seniority authority ordinance pursuant to se…
- BASHIR AHMED SHAH v. SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, C&W, KARACHI 1992 PLC(CS) 345
The R13 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), sections 4 and 8, were added to this standard by the competent authority of the Department of Promotion to determine the eligibility or eligibility of…
- KHURSHID AHMED v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 350
The R4 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), withdrew from service charges against Section 4 civil servants that they were in the habit of taking indefinite leave. That he was absent from unauthor…
- AIJAZ AHMED KHAN v. CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 354
Sections 2 and 8 Sindh Government Employees (Probation, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, Rr 8 and 10 Adhoc Promotions Government employees were promoted on an ad hoc basis, but were regulated by…
- MOULA BUX v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SUKKUR 1992 PLC(CS) 604
Section 4 Appeal After dismissing the appeal filed by the public servant against dismissal, he filed a constitutional petition, after which the appeal against dismissal was withdrawn, after which the …
- RAISUDDIN v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 608
Section 4 Appeal Limit Government employee was not filing a departmental appeal against changing his date 28 28 1985, but was submitted on 8th 1987, which was dismissed Government employee appeals aga…
- ALI AKBAR v. D.I.G.P. COMMANDANT SINDH RESERVE POLICE KARACHI 1992 PLC(CS) 666
R12 21 The Sindh Police (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1988, R2 (v) can be done under the leave of the Police Constable, R12 21, Police Rules, 1934 when he was proved to be an effective police of…
- ALI KHAN SHAIKH v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI 1992 PLC(CS) 674
Section App Appeal Limit Government employee terminated the right to end the Departmental Appeal, which was partially allowed, a second review petition was filed before the Department Authority which …
- GHULAM NABI BALOCH v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 678
R 4 Disciplinary action Specific allegations against a civil servant for whom the Inquiry Officer escaped the notice of the departmental authorities, while the authority imposed a fine on it, taking a…
- BAQAR ALI v. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SUKKUR 1992 PLC(CS) 826
R16 19 Sindh Police (Performance and Discipline) Rules, 1988, R6 (6) R16 19, Action started against the police officer under police rules, 1934 while convicted under R6 (6). , Sindh Police (Performanc…
- AFTAB AHMED QURESHI v. CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH, KARACHI 1992 PLC(CS) 841
Article 25 The meaning of equality of citizens and the equal protection of jurisdiction law, shall not be construed to treat every citizen the same in any case, but it is presumed that such persons or…
- GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 858
Section 10 transfer was to transfer a public servant to any place that includes this office under the federal government or any provincial government or even a local authority, institution or corporat…
- AHSANULLAH A. MEMON v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 1157
Section 8 Sindh Civil Servants (Appointment, Promotion, Exchange) Rules, 1974, R7 Sindh Civil Servants (Promotion, Certification and Sanity) Rules, 1975, Earl 10 and 12 Seniority Response Government E…
- MUHAMMAD MURTAZA KHAN v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 1167
The jurisdiction of the appeal relating to the jurisdiction of the Section 4 Tribunal was barred when a decision on a department order or fitness was involved in addition to the appointment or promoti…
- EID MUHAMMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 1992 PLC(CS) 1172
Section 4 Appeals Against Sentencing Sentencing Two separate appeals, one filed by E by and the other by MM \, were dealt with by a decision direct to the government employee \ e directly. The article…
Other years — Service Tribunal Sindh
2014 · 2013 · 2011 · 2010 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977 · 1976
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.